Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus FE-5020, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XP200 was released 3 years after the FE-5020 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores against the FE-5020 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Olympus FE-5020. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus FE-5020
| Fujifilm XP200 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 45 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Fujifilm XP200
| FE-5020 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus FE-5020
| Fujifilm XP200 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 comes with exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus FE-5020 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus FE-5020 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the FE-5020.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and FE-5020 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and FE-5020.
As you can see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Fujifilm XP200 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XP200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Otherwise known as | - | X-935 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 137g (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $160 |