Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus VG-160, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm XP200 was launched 15 months after the VG-160 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades versus the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Olympus VG-160
| Fujifilm XP200 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 15 months |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Fujifilm XP200
| VG-160 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Olympus VG-160
| Fujifilm XP200 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 enjoys exterior measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP200 versus Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the VG-160.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and VG-160 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through specifications. The pic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and VG-160.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Fujifilm XP200 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP200 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm XP200 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 165 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $90 |
