Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-30, both Waterproof cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XP200 was manufactured 18 months prior to the WG-30 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-30
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Fujifilm XP200
| WG-30 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | March 2013 | More modern by 18 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-30
| Fujifilm XP200 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 features outside measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the WG-30.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-30 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-30.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of images however you should take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-03-22 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $428 |