Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Released March 2013
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

In this article, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-30, both Waterproof cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm XP200 was manufactured 18 months prior to the WG-30 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-30

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-30 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Fujifilm XP200

 WG-30 Fujifilm XP200 
IntroducedOctober 2014March 2013More modern by 18 months

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-30

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-30 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 features outside measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm XP200 versus Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the WG-30.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-30 is 90 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The image below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-30.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of images however you should take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography advice
30
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
35
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-30 Street photography advice
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
61
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Sports photography camera
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
low frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
45
image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Travel photography information
Ricoh WG-30 Travel photography information
66
weather proof
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
71
weather proofing
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography factors
45
decently wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
43
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent MP (16MP)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm XP200
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-30
31
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
33
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-30
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Company FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Ricoh WG-30
Type Waterproof Waterproof
Released 2013-03-22 2014-10-09
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.10 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lbs) 192 gr (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 300 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50A D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $250 $428