Clicky

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
  • Introduced March 2013
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

Below is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm XP200 was introduced 10 months before the WG-4 GPS which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-4 GPS 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm XP200

 WG-4 GPS Fujifilm XP200 
ReleasedFebruary 2014March 2013More recent by 10 months
Manual focus More accurate focus

Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 Fujifilm XP200 WG-4 GPS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 has exterior dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the WG-4 GPS.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-4 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The photograph below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and WG-4 GPS.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older Fujifilm XP200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
30
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
41
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography highlights
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than average (235g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
66
environment sealing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
69
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 shots)
heavier than average (235g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography details
45
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse recording
54
has manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery (240 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging information
31
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no microphone socket
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic support
heavier than average (235 grams)
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm XP200 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Fujifilm FinePix XP200Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix XP200 Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Class Waterproof Waterproof
Introduced 2013-03-22 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.10 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 232g (0.51 pounds) 235g (0.52 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 240 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-50A D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/ SDHC/ SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $250 $210