Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8dbe/a8dbe87a76c6df650205e9886425d34d8f395a25" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front Fujifilm FinePix XP200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15418/15418ee0968ee6e7d25e3170c052632adc898e25" alt="Samsung WB850F front Samsung WB850F front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Announced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP200 was announced 15 months later than the WB850F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm XP200 grades versus the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 & Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung WB850F
Fujifilm XP200 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2013 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 15 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+306k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Fujifilm XP200
WB850F | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung WB850F
Fujifilm XP200 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP200 features external dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 vs the WB850F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffe56/ffe56930466d952e4c224f848e46546fb007a0f0" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and WB850F is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8231b/8231ba2a92deade9e98345f2fd6638305fd5c93a" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP200 and WB850F.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer Fujifilm XP200 provides an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cc8e/1cc8e29088ecbe87b32d4e22b3cb1e731ed9a35a" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be614/be6144765fe8a24a55254b2eaf39ed33ff9c5efe" alt="Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung WB850F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-03-22 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $250 | $599 |