Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000
94 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76448/764487fbfc6e771bad8a4d5805ae77003b83ddb7" alt="Fujifilm FinePix XP30 front Fujifilm FinePix XP30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 165g - 99 x 68 x 24mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Previous Model is FujiFilm XP10
- Newer Model is Fujifilm XP50
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Fujifilm XP30 and Olympus 9000, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm XP30 (14MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The Fujifilm XP30 was announced 2 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm XP30 grades against the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP30 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm XP30 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP30 over the Olympus 9000
Fujifilm XP30 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm XP30
9000 | Fujifilm XP30 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP30 and Olympus 9000
Fujifilm XP30 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XP30 has external dimensions of 99mm x 68mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.7" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP30 and Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm XP30 compared to the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e703/2e703dfe7d5b5791d1e1ab7a340203beccdfbe01" alt="Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP30 and 9000 is 94 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33840/33840d87cac2dc798bb6afc79c0bd6eb4480c73f" alt="Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm XP30 and 9000.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm XP30 to deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XP30 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21bbf/21bbf1edd44c9818d0002e1192a186f3c46650ef" alt="Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be936/be936ec55b19145cb08a56b55468b95781f6ffe3" alt="Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm XP30 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP30 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP30 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju 9000 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 9cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 68 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.7" x 0.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $240 | $300 |