Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F
93 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 183g - 104 x 67 x 26mm
- Launched June 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm XP50
- New Model is Fujifilm XP70
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XP60 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XP60 was launched 6 months later than the WB800F which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the Fujifilm XP60 matches up vs the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP60 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP60 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP60 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XP60 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm XP60
| WB800F | Fujifilm XP60 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP60 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm XP60 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm XP60 has external measurements of 104mm x 67mm x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm XP60 compared to the WB800F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XP60 and WB800F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP60 and WB800F.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you should really factor the age of the cameras into account.
Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm XP60 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP60 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP60 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-06-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 183g (0.40 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 67 x 26mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $180 | $300 |
