Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
95 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
![Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR front Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-Z1000EXR/Fujifilm-Z1000EXR-front.jpg)
![Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV/Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 157g - 102 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the Fujifilm Z1000EXR (1/2") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm Z1000EXR was revealed 4 months later than the GR Digital IV and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm Z1000EXR scores against the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z1000EXR Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z1000EXR over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm Z1000EXR | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm Z1000EXR
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm Z1000EXR | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z1000EXR versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR compared to the GR Digital IV.
![Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Z1000EXR-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.
![Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Z1000EXR-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Fujifilm Z1000EXR will render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics more aggressively.
![Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Z1000EXR-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-Z1000EXR-vs-Ricoh-GR-Digital-IV-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 9cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 30 cm–3.0 m / Tele: 1.0m–2.1 m) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 157 gr (0.35 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 390 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat), Couple, Portrait) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $599 |