Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 157g - 102 x 60 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm Z1000EXR (1/2") and WG-80 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Z1000EXR was unveiled 11 years before the WG-80 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm Z1000EXR scores vs the WG-80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR and Ricoh WG-80. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Z1000EXR Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z1000EXR over the Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm Z1000EXR | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Fujifilm Z1000EXR
| WG-80 | Fujifilm Z1000EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | January 2012 | Newer by 126 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and Ricoh WG-80
| Fujifilm Z1000EXR | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR versus the WG-80.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specifications. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and WG-80.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR has got the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged Fujifilm Z1000EXR will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-05 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 9cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 30 cm–3.0 m / Tele: 1.0m–2.1 m) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 157 grams (0.35 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat), Couple, Portrait) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $300 |