Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 157g - 102 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm Z1000EXR (1/2") and PL200 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm Z1000EXR was manufactured 18 months after the PL200 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm Z1000EXR scores vs the PL200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR & Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z1000EXR Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z1000EXR over the Samsung PL200
| Fujifilm Z1000EXR | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Fujifilm Z1000EXR
| PL200 | Fujifilm Z1000EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and Samsung PL200
| Fujifilm Z1000EXR | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR has got external measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has specifications of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR against the PL200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and PL200 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The image here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z1000EXR and PL200.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm Z1000EXR featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm Z1000EXR will offer more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm Z1000EXR will have an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z1000EXR vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z1000EXR | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 30 cm–3.0 m / Tele: 1.0m–2.1 m) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 157 gr (0.35 lb) | 170 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat), Couple, Portrait) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $0 |