Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 91 x 59 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm Z30 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z30 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Z30 was released 4 years prior to the WB800F and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z30 scores vs the WB800F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z30 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z30 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z30 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Z30 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm Z30
| WB800F | Fujifilm Z30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | February 2009 | More recent by 47 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z30 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Z30 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z30 has got external measurements of 91mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Z30 and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Z30 vs the WB800F.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z30 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The graphic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z30 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z30 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z30 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z30 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z30 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-02-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 3s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110 gr (0.24 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 91 x 59 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $150 | $300 |