Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410
96 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm Z33WP was introduced 4 years prior to the VH-410 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z33WP scores vs the VH-410 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP and Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Olympus VH-410
| Fujifilm Z33WP | VH-410 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| VH-410 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 38 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus VH-410
| Fujifilm Z33WP | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z33WP enjoys exterior dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Olympus VH-410 has sizing of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to the VH-410.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z33WP and VH-410 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The visual here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z33WP and VH-410.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VH-410 to produce more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP will be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus VH-410 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $197 | $186 |