Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is fairly close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Z33WP was brought out 13 months before the CX4 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z33WP scores versus the CX4 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm Z33WP | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| CX4 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 | July 2009 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm Z33WP | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z33WP provides outside measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP and the CX4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z33WP and CX4 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z33WP and CX4.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you have to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm Z33WP will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $197 | $211 |