Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Old Model is Olympus E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-160, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-330 was introduced 6 years earlier than the VG-160 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-330 grades vs the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus VG-160
E-330 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-330
VG-160 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2006 | More modern by 70 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-160
E-330 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 has outer dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-330 vs the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f53f6/f53f655452cadc3babc52d9bfc9d1522f93b538e" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and VG-160 is 65 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1489/a1489a5b34f022075fdb5ac324a0ac30a36a2d0e" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The pic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and VG-160.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-160 will deliver extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3a36/f3a36e56e456c19862844cd24b625bbb0a8ba30d" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c074/3c0742e25d32299a84c78bcd2de696f9fda14415" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus VG-160 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2006-03-18 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 pounds) | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 165 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $1,100 | $90 |