Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm Z33WP and Samsung WB800F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm Z33WP was announced 4 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades against the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Z33WP | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| WB800F | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Z33WP | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z33WP has outer measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Z33WP and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP against the WB800F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z33WP and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The picture here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z33WP and WB800F.
All in all, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to resolve greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z33WP is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $197 | $300 |
