Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
96 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-5010 (12MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe FE-5010 was launched 5 years earlier than the TG-630 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the FE-5010 scores versus the TG-630 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5010 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-5010 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| FE-5010 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus FE-5010
| TG-630 iHS | FE-5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5010 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| FE-5010 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus FE-5010 features exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has specifications of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the FE-5010 versus the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-5010 and TG-630 iHS is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5010 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP and you can expect similar quality of photos though you will need to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more aged FE-5010 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-5010 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-5010 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-180mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $200 |
