Clicky

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front
 
Kodak EasyShare Z950 front
Portability
89
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z35
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
  • Launched June 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm Z35 was brought out 10 months earlier than the Z950 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades versus the Z950 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Kodak Z950

 Fujifilm Z35 Z950 

Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm Z35

 Z950 Fujifilm Z35 
LaunchedJune 2010July 2009More recent by 10 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Kodak Z950

 Fujifilm Z35 Z950 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z35 features external dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has dimensions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the Z950.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and Z950 is 95 and 89 respectively.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z35 and Z950.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Kodak Z950 to result in greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Portrait photography features
Kodak Z950 Portrait photography features
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
29
you can focus manually
no external flash support
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Street photography factors
Kodak Z950 Street photography factors
54
lighter than competition (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competitors (243 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Sports photography camera
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Travel photography info
Kodak Z950 Travel photography info
56
lighter than competition (125 grams)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
52
has built in flash
great zoom (350mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (243g)
resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Landscape photography details
Kodak Z950 Landscape photography details
22
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
37
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Vlogging info
Kodak Z950 Vlogging info
25
lighter than competition (125g)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic socket
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (243 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm Z35 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z35 and Kodak Z950
 Fujifilm FinePix Z35Kodak EasyShare Z950
General Information
Make FujiFilm Kodak
Model Fujifilm FinePix Z35 Kodak EasyShare Z950
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-07-22 2010-06-16
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max boosted ISO - 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 35-350mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus range 8cm 6cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 3 secs 1/8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/1250 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.10 m 5.40 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lb) 243 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-45A KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $130 $250