Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and 6020 (13MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Z35 was released 6 months earlier than the 6020 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores versus the 6020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm Z35 | 6020 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Fujifilm Z35
| 6020 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus 6020
| Fujifilm Z35 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 |  | February 2010 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 has got external dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the 6020.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and 6020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and 6020.
All in all, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus 6020 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3s | 1/4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 122g (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $130 | $279 |
