Clicky

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
22
Overall
32
Ricoh WG-M1 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Following is a extended assessment of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The WG-M1 was introduced 8 months after the DP2 Quattro which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-M1 grades vs the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WG-M1 DP2 Quattro 
IntroducedSeptember 2014February 2014More modern by 8 months

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-M1

 DP2 Quattro WG-M1 
Manual focus More exact focus
Display dimension3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution920k115kCrisper display (+805k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 WG-M1 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the WG-M1 and the DP2 Quattro.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Generally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-M1 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
30
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
77
manual focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography highlights
53
weather proof
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
max ISO too low (800)
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
38
megapixel count decent (14MP)
weather proof
great battery life (350 shots)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
48
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography information
64
great battery life (350 per charge)
weather proof
megapixel count decent (14MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
53
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-M1
Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
35
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
weather proof
great battery life (350 shots)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inches)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
59
manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
missing external mic port
9
lack of video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Ricoh WG-M1Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh WG-M1 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2014-09-12 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 800 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range (1×) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 115 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed - 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190g (0.42 lb) 395g (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-65 BP-51
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media microSD/microSDHC, internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $2,000 $931