Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sigma. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-M1 was introduced 8 months after the DP2 Quattro which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-M1 grades vs the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-M1 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-M1 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2014 | More modern by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-M1
DP2 Quattro | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-M1 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-M1 offers exterior dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the WG-M1 and the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36815/368151a73869b25fb521d98994b5eea88d200255" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-M1 and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc02f/cc02f63d96c764200562f7fb3ed505095a8550f9" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-M1 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa599/fa59956833709dbda12189d993d876de852036f3" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2c52/b2c52db8a9e9efd125ed9432a158dafba7c5d9b5" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | (1×) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 395g (0.87 lb) |
Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | BP-51 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $2,000 | $931 |