Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm Z35 was brought out 4 years earlier than the XZ-10 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores against the XZ-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus XZ-10
| Fujifilm Z35 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Fujifilm Z35
| XZ-10 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 42 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus XZ-10
| Fujifilm Z35 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z35 provides exterior measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-10 has measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the XZ-10.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and XZ-10 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The visual below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z35 and XZ-10.
All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus XZ-10 to give you more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 3 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $130 | $428 |