Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320
95 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Z35 was announced 3 years earlier than the TG-320 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up versus the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm Z35
| TG-320 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 has physical measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 compared to the TG-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to result in greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 3s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $0 |