Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Z35 was released 4 years earlier than the TG-2 iHS which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up vs the TG-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Fujifilm Z35
| TG-2 iHS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 47 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z35 comes with exterior measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-2 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-2 iHS.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-2 iHS to render more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 3 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $130 | $380 |