Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Fujifilm Z35 and Pentax WG-10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Pentax. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WG-10 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Z35 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the WG-10 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores against the WG-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Pentax WG-10. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Pentax WG-10
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Fujifilm Z35
| WG-10 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 47 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Pentax WG-10
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z35 has external dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-10 has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Z35 and Pentax WG-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the WG-10.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-10 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-10.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-10 to resolve extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Z35 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Pentax |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Pentax WG-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2013-06-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 0.7fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 1.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $130 | $0 |