Clicky

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z35
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
  • Launched July 2009
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm Z35 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm Z35 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades vs the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh WG-4

 Fujifilm Z35 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Fujifilm Z35

 WG-4 Fujifilm Z35 
ReleasedFebruary 2014July 2009Fresher by 55 months
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh WG-4

 Fujifilm Z35 WG-4 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 offers physical dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Fujifilm Z35 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 vs the WG-4.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-4.

All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 to deliver greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography highlights
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
41
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Street photography camera
54
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Sports photography information
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography information
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than average in class (125g)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
72
weather sealing
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 per charge)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography features
22
manual focus not available
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
tiny screen (2.5")
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
54
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
terrible battery (240 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm Z35
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
25
lighter than average in class (125g)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone support
36
rather wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh WG-4
 Fujifilm FinePix Z35Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm FinePix Z35 Ricoh WG-4
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2009-07-22 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 8cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 3 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 pounds) 230 gr (0.51 pounds)
Dimensions 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-45A D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $130 $330