Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4036a/4036a5c141de5ade52ff4704395d37b58b6f4514" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm Z35 and Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm Z35 was manufactured 7 months prior to the TL350 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores versus the TL350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Samsung TL350
Fujifilm Z35 | TL350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Fujifilm Z35
TL350 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Samsung TL350
Fujifilm Z35 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 has physical dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z35 and Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03182/031825eb0896e05d77fab74df60b0f12126d3609" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and TL350 is 95 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4054a/4054ad7195601d4b4ace364634ba3cca6549fbc3" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and TL350.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution so you can expect similar quality of files however you should really factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92c28/92c286cd702e42d793e585d2419a1230d71307e6" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28af9/28af9318cbd433f4449a08e510073e991b7892ba" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Samsung TL350 |
Other name | - | WB2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 3s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 195g (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $130 | $400 |