Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z37 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Z37 was brought out 24 months before the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm Z37 matches up against the VR-320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z37 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm Z37 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z37 over the Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm Z37 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm Z37
| VR-320 | Fujifilm Z37 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2011 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z37 and Olympus VR-320
| Fujifilm Z37 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z37 provides physical dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z37 against the VR-320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z37 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z37 and VR-320.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus VR-320 to provide you with greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z37 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z37 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z37 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $130 | $179 |
