Clicky

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42
Fujifilm S9800 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm S9800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2015
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Renewed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

Here is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9800 (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm S9800 was revealed 5 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm S9800 matches up against the SP-800 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9800 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm S9800 SP-800 UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2015February 2010Fresher by 61 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm S9800

 SP-800 UZ Fujifilm S9800 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm S9800 SP-800 UZ 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9800 offers physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S9800 compared to the SP-800 UZ.

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9800 and SP-800 UZ is 61 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9800 and SP-800 UZ.

As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm S9800 to give greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9800 provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography highlights
37
MP count good (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Street photography factors
Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography factors
41
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than others in class (670g)
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S9800
Sports photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
53
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
46
amazing zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Travel photography features
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography features
57
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (670 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
61
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (840mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-800 UZ Landscape photography factors
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
41
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Vlogging information
Olympus SP-800 UZ Vlogging information
57
relatively wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
no external mic jack
heavier than others in class (670g)
24
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Fujifilm S9800Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm S9800 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2015-01-14 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 1000
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 143
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing distance 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 920 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 12 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) 3.10 m
Flash modes Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 grams (1.48 lb) 455 grams (1.00 lb)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID 4 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $299 $270