Clicky

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s

Portability
61
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45
Fujifilm S9900w front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
Portability
86
Imaging
48
Features
43
Overall
46

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs

Fujifilm S9900w
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Released January 2015
Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Released November 2010
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-PL2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Fujifilm S9900w versus Olympus E-PL1s, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the Fujifilm S9900w (1/2.3") and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm S9900w was released 4 years after the E-PL1s which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S9900w scores versus the E-PL1s with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Olympus E-PL1s

 Fujifilm S9900w E-PL1s 
ReleasedJanuary 2015November 2010More modern by 51 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Fujifilm S9900w

 E-PL1s Fujifilm S9900w 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus E-PL1s

 Fujifilm S9900w E-PL1s 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9900w features physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1s has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm S9900w versus Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w and the E-PL1s.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and E-PL1s is 61 and 86 respectively.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The pic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9900w and E-PL1s.

Plainly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm S9900w due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Fujifilm S9900w will produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9900w is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Portrait photography details
Olympus E-PL1s Portrait photography details
44
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
60
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Street photography camera
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than others in class (670 grams)
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Sports photography details
Olympus E-PL1s Sports photography details
53
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
low fps (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
terrible battery (290 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Travel photography advice
Olympus E-PL1s Travel photography advice
61
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
heavier than others in class (670g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
52
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (290 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9900w
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL1s
50
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
55
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (290 shots)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w Vlogging info
Olympus E-PL1s Vlogging info
57
quite wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
no mic support
heavier than others in class (670g)
30
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus E-PL1s
 Fujifilm S9900wOlympus PEN E-PL1s
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm S9900w Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2015-01-14 2010-11-16
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Number of lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 920k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 97 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670 gr (1.48 pounds) 334 gr (0.74 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 290 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID 4 x AA BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $719 $599