Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s
61 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
86 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released November 2010
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL2
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Fujifilm S9900w versus Olympus E-PL1s, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the Fujifilm S9900w (1/2.3") and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm S9900w was released 4 years after the E-PL1s which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S9900w scores versus the E-PL1s with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm S9900w & Olympus PEN E-PL1s. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Olympus E-PL1s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Olympus E-PL1s
Fujifilm S9900w | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | November 2010 | More modern by 51 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Fujifilm S9900w
E-PL1s | Fujifilm S9900w |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus E-PL1s
Fujifilm S9900w | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9900w features physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1s has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9900w versus Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w and the E-PL1s.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and E-PL1s is 61 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through specifications. The pic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9900w and E-PL1s.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm S9900w due to its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Fujifilm S9900w will produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9900w is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus PEN E-PL1s |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-01-14 | 2010-11-16 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 290 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $719 | $599 |