Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
61 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
![Fujifilm S9900w front Fujifilm S9900w front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-S9900w/Fujifilm-S9900w-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-800-UZ/Olympus-SP-800-UZ-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm S9900w was revealed 5 years after the SP-800 UZ which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm S9900w scores versus the SP-800 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm S9900w & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm S9900w | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 61 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm S9900w
SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm S9900w |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm S9900w | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9900w features outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w vs the SP-800 UZ.
![Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-S9900w-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and SP-800 UZ is 61 and 69 respectively.
![Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-S9900w-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The image below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9900w and SP-800 UZ.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Fujifilm S9900w to offer greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9900w provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-S9900w-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-S9900w-vs-Olympus-SP-800-UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-01-14 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 12 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $719 | $270 |