Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb6b/adb6b6dbb50e00fd8deaef5aea86c0a5d53b5fa1" alt="Fujifilm S9900w front Fujifilm S9900w front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6ab/5d6ab0cbebead61d2753128e80f83032c04f27ad" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 front"
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 218g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ10
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and ZS7 (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Fujifilm S9900w was unveiled 3 years later than the ZS7 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic ZS7 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S9900w grades vs the ZS7 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm S9900w & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Panasonic ZS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Panasonic ZS7
Fujifilm S9900w | ZS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2015 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 43 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS7 over the Fujifilm S9900w
ZS7 | Fujifilm S9900w |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Panasonic ZS7
Fujifilm S9900w | ZS7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Equal display resolution |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9900w provides physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS7 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w compared to the ZS7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84d64/84d646419ec499a5240c741cfd2db3ac82dddd6a" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9900w and ZS7 is 61 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30c1a/30c1ac9a9494547c0b92d3c5cb99263f8300acdc" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9900w and ZS7.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Fujifilm S9900w to show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm S9900w should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b6a4/8b6a4397292d4cfba0a95cac60e94d74f02cc396" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03eb1/03eb17dadaa3abf0fc05ed3419405c9a90aafb91" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Panasonic ZS7 Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model type | Fujifilm S9900w | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ10 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $719 | $350 |