Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Successor is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Announced September 2022
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm X-H1 and Hasselblad X2D, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and X2D (100MP) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and X2D (Medium format) posses different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-H1 was revealed 5 years prior to the X2D and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-H1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm X-H1 matches up against the X2D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H1 & Hasselblad X2D 100c. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery & Hasselblad X2D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-H1 | X2D |
---|
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Fujifilm X-H1
X2D | Fujifilm X-H1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2022 | February 2018 | Fresher by 55 months | |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+1320k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-H1 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-H1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Hasselblad X2D has sizing of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-H1 and Hasselblad X2D in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 versus the X2D.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H1 and X2D is 61 and 56 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-H1 and X2D.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-H1 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Hasselblad X2D will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 76 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-H1 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X2D Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Hasselblad X2D 100c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm X-H1 | Hasselblad X2D 100c |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2018-02-14 | 2022-09-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | X-Processor Pro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 100 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 11656 x 8742 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | 294 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Available lenses | 54 | 13 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.60 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 2,360k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | 5,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 4080s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0 frames per second | 3.3 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | - |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 673g (1.48 lb) | 895g (1.97 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 420 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Pricing at release | $1,300 | $8,199 |