Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990
61 Imaging
69 Features
85 Overall
75
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced February 2018
- Newer Model is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally Known as EasyShare Max
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Kodak Z990, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and Z990 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and Z990 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-H1 was released 7 years later than the Z990 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-H1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the Fujifilm X-H1 grades versus the Z990 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-H1 and Kodak EasyShare Z990. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery and Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Kodak Z990
Fujifilm X-H1 | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | January 2011 | Fresher by 87 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Fujifilm X-H1
Z990 | Fujifilm X-H1 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Kodak Z990
Fujifilm X-H1 | Z990 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-H1 enjoys outer measurements of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z990 has measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Kodak Z990 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 vs the Z990.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H1 and Z990 is 61 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Z990.
As you can see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-H1 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H1 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-H1 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm X-H1 | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
Also Known as | - | EasyShare Max |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2018-02-14 | 2011-01-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | X-Processor Pro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 54 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 14.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 673 grams (1.48 lb) | 445 grams (0.98 lb) |
Dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at release | $1,300 | $299 |