Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240
61 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
74 Imaging
68 Features
47 Overall
59
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Released February 2018
- New Model is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released September 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Leica. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and the M Typ 240 (24MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) offer different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm X-H1 was released 5 years after the M Typ 240 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-H1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-H1 grades versus the M Typ 240 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H1 and Leica M Typ 240. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery and Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Leica M Typ 240
| Fujifilm X-H1 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 | September 2012 | More modern by 66 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Fujifilm X-H1
| M Typ 240 | Fujifilm X-H1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Leica M Typ 240
| Fujifilm X-H1 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-H1 has got physical dimensions of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 240 has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 vs the M Typ 240.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H1 and M Typ 240 is 61 and 74 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H1 and M Typ 240.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H1 has the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field harder. The newer Fujifilm X-H1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H1 | Leica M Typ 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Leica |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-H1 | Leica M Typ 240 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Released | 2018-02-14 | 2012-09-17 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | X-Processor Pro | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5952 x 3976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 325 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Fujifilm X | Leica M |
| Total lenses | 54 | 59 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 1 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 14.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 673g (1.48 lb) | 680g (1.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 84 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1860 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photos | 500 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $1,300 | $5,479 |