Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2013
- Previous Model is Pentax Q10
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax Q7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and Q7 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and Q7 (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M1 II was revealed 3 years after the Q7 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II grades versus the Q7 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Pentax Q7. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax Q7
E-M1 II | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | August 2013 | Newer by 38 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus E-M1 II
Q7 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax Q7
E-M1 II | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax Q7 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax Q7 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the Q7.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and Q7 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and Q7.
As you can see, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will render extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax Q7 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Number of lenses | 107 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 200 gr (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 250 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $480 |