Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II
61 Imaging
69 Features
85 Overall
75
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced February 2018
- Replacement is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Olympus E-M10 II, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) boast different sensor sizing.
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or MThe Fujifilm X-H1 was unveiled 2 years after the E-M10 II which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm X-H1 matches up against the E-M10 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | August 2015 | Newer by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Fujifilm X-H1
E-M10 II | Fujifilm X-H1 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-H1 enjoys exterior measurements of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 and the E-M10 II.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M10 II is 61 and 82 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M10 II.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H1 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H1 will offer more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-H1 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2018-02-14 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor Pro | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 14.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 673 grams (1.48 pounds) | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 320 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Launch price | $1,300 | $499 |