Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Superseded the Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm X-H2 was released 6 years after the E-M1 II which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores vs the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2022 | September 2016 | More modern by 73 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M1 II | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.00" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H2 provides physical dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 and the E-M1 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1 II is 62 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1 II.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H2 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X-H2 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 20MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-H2 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 82 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3.00" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 15.0 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 lb) | 574g (1.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 photos | 350 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Dual | Dual |
Pricing at launch | $1,999 | $1,700 |