Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II
62 Imaging
74 Features
93 Overall
81
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Superseded the Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-H2 was released 6 years after the E-M1 II which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores vs the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2022 | September 2016 | More modern by 73 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Fujifilm X-H2
| E-M1 II | Fujifilm X-H2 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M1 II
| Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.00" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H2 provides physical dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 and the E-M1 II.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1 II is 62 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1 II.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H2 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X-H2 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 20MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-H2 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2016-09-19 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 82 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3.00" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 15.0 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MOV, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 660g (1.46 lb) | 574g (1.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 680 photos | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Storage slots | Dual | Dual |
| Pricing at launch | $1,999 | $1,700 |