Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
62 Imaging
77 Features
93 Overall
83
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Announced September 2022
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-H2 was unveiled 12 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-H2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H2 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Fujifilm X-H2 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2022 | March 2010 | More modern by 152 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Clearer screen (+700k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Fujifilm X-H2
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Fujifilm X-H2 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3.00" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-H2 features external measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 62 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H2 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H2 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H2 will provide you with more detail having an extra 30MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-H2 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-09-08 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 82 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 15.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 7680x4320 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 images | 410 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W235 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $1,999 | $349 |