Clicky

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
52
Imaging
38
Features
55
Overall
44
Fujifilm X-S1 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm X-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
  • Introduced November 2011
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Fujifilm X-S1 was launched 22 months later than the SP-800 UZ making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm X-S1 grades versus the SP-800 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm X-S1 SP-800 UZ 
ReleasedNovember 2011February 2010Fresher by 22 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm X-S1

 SP-800 UZ Fujifilm X-S1 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 Fujifilm X-S1 SP-800 UZ 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-S1 offers exterior measurements of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") along with a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 versus the SP-800 UZ.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-S1 and SP-800 UZ is 52 and 69 respectively.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-S1 and SP-800 UZ.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-S1 because of its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-S1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Portrait photography information
Olympus SP-800 UZ Portrait photography information
46
you can focus manually
offers face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Street photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
52
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
sensor is small (2/3")
heavier than others in class (920g)
46
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Sports photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
44
great zoom range (24-624mm 26.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
47
great zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Travel photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
43
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long reach (624mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than others in class (920 grams)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
61
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
great zoom (840mm)
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
45
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (2/3")
no Time Lapse recording
41
pretty wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Vlogging camera
26
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external mic support
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
heavier than others in class (920g)
24
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Fujifilm X-S1Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-S1 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-11-24 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max enhanced ISO 12800 1000
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 49 143
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-624mm (26.0x) 28-840mm (30.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 12 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 8.00 m 3.10 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 920 grams (2.03 lbs) 455 grams (1.00 lbs)
Dimensions 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery model NP-95 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $399 $270