Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
52 Imaging
38 Features
55 Overall
44
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
- Introduced November 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Later Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm X-S1 was launched 22 months later than the SP-800 UZ making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm X-S1 grades versus the SP-800 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-S1 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm X-S1 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2011 | February 2010 | Fresher by 22 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Fujifilm X-S1
SP-800 UZ | Fujifilm X-S1 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
Fujifilm X-S1 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-S1 offers exterior measurements of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") along with a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 versus the SP-800 UZ.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-S1 and SP-800 UZ is 52 and 69 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-S1 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-S1 because of its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-S1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Fujifilm X-S1 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-S1 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-11-24 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | TruePic III |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | 1000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-624mm (26.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 12 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 920 grams (2.03 lbs) | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-95 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $399 | $270 |