Clicky

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
52
Imaging
38
Features
55
Overall
44
Fujifilm X-S1 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
  • Announced November 2011
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

In this article, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and VR-330 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

The Fujifilm X-S1 was released 10 months after the VR-330 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm X-S1 grades vs the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Olympus VR-330

 Fujifilm X-S1 VR-330 
RevealedNovember 2011February 2011More modern by 10 months
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Fujifilm X-S1

 VR-330 Fujifilm X-S1 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus VR-330

 Fujifilm X-S1 VR-330 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Screen resolution460k460kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-S1 has external dimensions of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") accompanied by a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 and the VR-330.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S1 and VR-330 is 52 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-S1 and VR-330.

As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-S1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-S1 provides an edge in sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
46
manual focus
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Street photography with Olympus VR-330
52
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
more heavy than competition in class (920g)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography features
44
incredible zoom range (24-624mm 26.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
lacks phase detect AF
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
43
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (624mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (920 grams)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
lighter than competition (158g)
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography details
45
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (2/3")
no Timelapse recording
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Vlogging details
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging details
26
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has microphone jack
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition in class (920 grams)
32
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
lighter than competition (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-S1 and Olympus VR-330
 Fujifilm X-S1Olympus VR-330
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X-S1 Olympus VR-330
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-11-24 2011-02-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 49 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-624mm (26.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.00 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 920 grams (2.03 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-95 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $399 $220