Clicky

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
52
Imaging
38
Features
55
Overall
44
Fujifilm X-S1 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
  • Revealed November 2011
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Samsung ST65, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and ST65 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm X-S1 was released 11 months later than the ST65 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm X-S1 scores against the ST65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Samsung ST65

 Fujifilm X-S1 ST65 
RevealedNovember 2011January 2011Fresher by 11 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Fujifilm X-S1

 ST65 Fujifilm X-S1 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung ST65

 Fujifilm X-S1 ST65 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Screen resolution460k460kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-S1 has external dimensions of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") along with a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm X-S1 versus Samsung ST65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 and the ST65.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S1 and ST65 is 52 and 99 respectively.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-S1 and ST65.

Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-S1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung ST65 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-S1 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Portrait photography factors
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography factors
46
focusing manually
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (2/3")
28
MP count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Street photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Street photography highlights
52
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
tiny sensor (2/3")
heavier than others (920 grams)
49
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
maximum ISO low (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Sports photography with Samsung ST65
44
long zoom range (24-624mm 26.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (2/3")
no phase detect autofocus
26
MP count good (14 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Travel photography camera
43
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (624mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (920 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
MP count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography advice
45
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (2/3")
no Time Lapse recording
37
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Vlogging features
Samsung ST65 Vlogging features
26
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external mic socket
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
heavier than others (920g)
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung ST65
 Fujifilm X-S1Samsung ST65
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model Fujifilm X-S1 Samsung ST65
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-11-24 2011-01-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 -
Highest boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 49 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-624mm (26.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 920g (2.03 lb) -
Dimensions 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery model NP-95 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $399 $130