Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Revealed October 2020
- Later Model is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-S10 was introduced 5 years after the E-M10 II which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm X-S10 scores vs the E-M10 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2020 | August 2015 | Newer by 63 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-M10 II | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-S10 enjoys outside measurements of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") along with a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has proportions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 and the E-M10 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M10 II is 73 and 82 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking specs. The picture underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M10 II.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-S10 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X-S10 will resolve greater detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-S10 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-10-15 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 465 gr (1.03 lbs) | 390 gr (0.86 lbs) |
Dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $999 | $499 |