Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Revealed October 2020
- Updated by Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-PL9, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm X-S10 was released 2 years after the E-PL9 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-S10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-S10 grades vs the E-PL9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery and Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-PL9
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2020 | February 2018 | More modern by 33 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-PL9 | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-PL9
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-S10 features exterior dimensions of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") with a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-PL9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 vs the E-PL9.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-PL9 is 73 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-PL9.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-S10 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-S10 will render extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-S10 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-10-15 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 465g (1.03 lb) | 380g (0.84 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $999 | $599 |