Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c03e/4c03e2a9fcac2086bdadb9eb5ea30a905ad8c4e7" alt="Fujifilm X-T20 front Fujifilm X-T20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 383g - 118 x 83 x 41mm
- Announced January 2017
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T10
- Refreshed by Fujifilm X-T30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2018
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T20 (24MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T20 (APS-C) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-T20 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the E-PL9 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T20 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm X-T20 matches up against the E-PL9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T20 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T20 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T20 over the Olympus E-PL9
Fujifilm X-T20 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Fujifilm X-T20
E-PL9 | Fujifilm X-T20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | January 2017 | More modern by 12 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T20 and Olympus E-PL9
Fujifilm X-T20 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T20 comes with outside dimensions of 118mm x 83mm x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T20 compared to the E-PL9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/407f3/407f39779b0947f8e15ca99f25a2c365c4558354" alt="Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T20 and E-PL9 is 83 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9426/c94265c3eae6c6d7459d3c201c4086bce4ac80e2" alt="Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T20 and E-PL9.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T20 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T20 will give more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-T20 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/851bc/851bc6c35e63dd74b591f9f94d1ec3de575b17ab" alt="Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d38fe/d38fe71cef0fb6b2bdd880373d37fc025c8d7a66" alt="Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T20 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T20 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2017-01-18 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | X-Processor Pro2 | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames per second | 8.6 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (ISO 100) | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 pounds) | 380 grams (0.84 pounds) |
Dimensions | 118 x 83 x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 350 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $900 | $599 |