Clicky

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1

Portability
80
Imaging
70
Features
87
Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Released January 2020
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm X-T100
Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Released October 2013
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview

The following is a extended review of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M1 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The Fujifilm X-T200 was brought out 6 years after the E-M1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up against the E-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M1

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M1 
ReleasedJanuary 2020October 2013Newer by 76 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution2780k1037kCrisper screen (+1743k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Fujifilm X-T200

 E-M1 Fujifilm X-T200 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M1 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 enjoys physical dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).

Contrast the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the E-M1.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 is 80 and 71 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1.

All in all, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will resolve extra detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T200 will have an edge in sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography factors
82
you can focus manually
good megapixels (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
exports RAW formats
71
you can focus manually
great flash sync speed (1/320s)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M1 as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates fully
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
supports focus by touch
does not have image stabilization
78
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
includes touch to focus
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (497 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 Sports photography highlights
70
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
low battery power (270 CIPA)
70
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
has phase detect autofocus
bad battery (350 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography details
Olympus E-M1 Travel photography details
79
connects via bluetooth
supports focus by touch
good megapixels (24MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
low battery power (270 per charge)
65
lighter than competition in class (497 grams)
weather proofing
includes touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
bad battery (350 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
73
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
lovely big screen (3.5")
good megapixels (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
does not have image stabilization
low battery power (270 CIPA)
73
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
bad battery (350 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M1 Vlogging advice
79
selfie friendly display
screen is touchscreen
offers face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external mic support
does not have image stabilization
36
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external mic socket
lighter than competition in class (497g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1
 Fujifilm X-T200Olympus OM-D E-M1
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-T200 Olympus OM-D E-M1
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Released 2020-01-22 2013-10-28
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePIC VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 12800 25600
Highest boosted ISO 51200 -
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 425 81
Lens
Lens mount Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 54 107
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 3.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 2,780k dots 1,037k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m (at ISO 200) no built-in flash
Flash settings - Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/320 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 370 gr (0.82 lb) 497 gr (1.10 lb)
Dimensions 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 757
Other
Battery life 270 photos 350 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W126S BLN-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $699 $799