Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76


71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Released January 2020
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M1 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor size.

The Fujifilm X-T200 was brought out 6 years after the E-M1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up against the E-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M1
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2020 | ![]() | October 2013 | Newer by 76 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+1743k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
E-M1 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 enjoys physical dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the E-M1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 is 80 and 71 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will resolve extra detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T200 will have an edge in sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-01-22 | 2013-10-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,780k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/320 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lb) | 497 gr (1.10 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 350 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $699 | $799 |