Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Released January 2020
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Released March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 II
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M10 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm X-T200 was released 5 years after the E-M10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores versus the E-M10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M10. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2020 |  | March 2014 | Newer by 72 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 2780k |  | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1743k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-M10 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 comes with external dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 has dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the E-M10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 is 80 and 82 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-T200 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2020-01-22 | 2014-03-18 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 2,780k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,440k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.58x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
| Flash modes | - | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual（1/1（FULL）～1/64） |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 370g (0.82 lbs) | 396g (0.87 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 884 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 pictures | 320 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $699 | $600 |