Clicky

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10

Portability
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
Portability
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Released January 2020
  • Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T100
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 II
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M10 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm X-T200 was released 5 years after the E-M10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores versus the E-M10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M10 
ReleasedJanuary 2020March 2014Newer by 72 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution2780k1037kClearer screen (+1743k dot)
Selfie screen  Take selfies
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Fujifilm X-T200

		

		

			
 E-M10 Fujifilm X-T200 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M10 
Manual focus  Dial exact focusing
Touch screen  Quickly navigate
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 comes with external dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 has dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the E-M10.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 is 80 and 82 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-T200 should have an edge in sensor tech.
	
			Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm X-T200
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10
82
 has manual focus
 resolution is good (24 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 provides face detect focus
 delivers RAW formats
71
 has manual focus
 decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 offers face detect focusing
 delivers RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Street Comparison
 Fujifilm X-T200 as a Street photography camera
 Olympus E-M10 as a Street photography camera
78
 screen articulates fully
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 delivers RAW formats
 comes with touch focus
 lack of image stabilization
77
 screen tilts
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 delivers RAW formats
 boasts focus via touch
 very good ISO range (25,600)
 more heavy than competition (396 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography details
Olympus E-M10 Sports photography details
70
 quiet mode (1/32,000s)
 resolution is good (24 megapixels)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 provides tracking focus
 comes with phase detect auto focus
 lack of image stabilization
 terrible battery life (270 per charge)
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 offers tracking focus
 no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M10 Travel photography factors
79
 has bluetooth
 comes with touch focus
 resolution is good (24 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 screen is selfie friendly
 terrible battery life (270 shots)
67
 boasts focus via touch
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 flash built-in
 more heavy than competition (396 grams)
 screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm X-T200
Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10
73
 has manual focus
 interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
 screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
 resolution is good (24MP)
 sensor size is nice (APS-C)
 delivers RAW formats
 lack of image stabilization
 terrible battery life (270 per charge)
79
 has manual focus
 swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
 pretty good screen size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
 decent megapixels (16MP)
 sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
 very good ISO range (25,600)
 delivers RAW formats
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 Vlogging info
Olympus E-M10 Vlogging info
79
 screen is selfie friendly
 screen is touchscreen
 provides face detect focus
 good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
 does have microphone socket
 lack of image stabilization
33
 screen is touchscreen
 built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
 offers face detect focusing
 video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 no microphone port
 more heavy than competition (396g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10
 Fujifilm X-T200Olympus OM-D E-M10
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X-T200 Olympus OM-D E-M10
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2020-01-22 2014-03-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 369.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW files    
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Autofocus selectice    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Live view autofocus    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Total focus points 425 81
Lens
Lens mount type Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 3.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 2,780k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch capability    
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 1,440k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.58x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 7.00 m (at ISO 200) 5.80 m (ISO100)
Flash modes - Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual（1/1（FULL）～1/64）
Hot shoe    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Fastest flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 370g (0.82 lbs) 396g (0.87 lbs)
Physical dimensions 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 72
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 884
Other
Battery life 270 pictures 320 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W126S BLS-5
Self timer Yes Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10))
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch price $699 $600