Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76


89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Announced January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm X-T200 was unveiled 6 years later than the E-PM2 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores vs the E-PM2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-PM2
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2020 | ![]() | May 2013 | Fresher by 82 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+2320k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Fujifilm X-T200
E-PM2 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-PM2
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 provides outer dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs the E-PM2.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-PM2 is 80 and 89 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The graphic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-PM2.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will give greater detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-T200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-01-22 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,780k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lbs) | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 pictures | 360 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $699 | $448 |