Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76


92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Introduced January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") possess different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm X-T200 was released 5 years after the Q-S1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades versus the Q-S1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T200 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Pentax Q-S1
Fujifilm X-T200 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2020 | ![]() | August 2014 | More modern by 67 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+2320k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
Q-S1 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Pentax Q-S1
Fujifilm X-T200 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 has physical dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the Q-S1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and Q-S1 is 80 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T200 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Pentax |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-01-22 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Pentax Q |
Available lenses | 54 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,780k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lbs) | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 images | 250 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $699 | $250 |