Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
![Fujifilm X-T200 front Fujifilm X-T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-T200/Fujifilm-X-T200-front.jpg)
![Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-Q-S1/Pentax-Q-S1-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Introduced January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") possess different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-T200 was released 5 years after the Q-S1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades versus the Q-S1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T200 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Pentax Q-S1
Fujifilm X-T200 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2020 | ![]() | August 2014 | More modern by 67 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+2320k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
Q-S1 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Pentax Q-S1
Fujifilm X-T200 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 has physical dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the Q-S1.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Pentax-Q-S1-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and Q-S1 is 80 and 92 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Pentax-Q-S1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T200 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Pentax-Q-S1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Pentax-Q-S1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Pentax |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-01-22 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Pentax Q |
Available lenses | 54 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,780k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lbs) | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 images | 250 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $699 | $250 |