Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Announced January 2020
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Released January 2012
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and WB850F (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-T200 was unveiled 8 years after the WB850F which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up against the WB850F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T200 & Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Samsung WB850F
Fujifilm X-T200 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2020 | January 2012 | Newer by 98 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 2780k | 614k | Clearer screen (+2166k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Fujifilm X-T200
WB850F | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Samsung WB850F
Fujifilm X-T200 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 enjoys external dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs the WB850F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and WB850F is 80 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The picture below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and WB850F.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will resolve greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-T200 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Samsung WB850F |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2020-01-22 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 2,780 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126S | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $699 | $599 |