Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
![Fujifilm X-T200 front Fujifilm X-T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-T200/Fujifilm-X-T200-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3/Sony-NEX-F3-front.jpg)
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Launched August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
- Successor is Sony NEX-3N
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony NEX-F3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-T200 was manufactured 7 years later than the NEX-F3 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores vs the NEX-F3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Sony NEX-F3
Fujifilm X-T200 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2020 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 91 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+1860k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Fujifilm X-T200
NEX-F3 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony NEX-F3
Fujifilm X-T200 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 has got outside measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony NEX-F3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the NEX-F3.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and NEX-F3 is 80 and 86 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and NEX-F3.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm X-T200 to result in extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-NEX-F3-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2012-08-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,780k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lb) | 314g (0.69 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 pictures | 470 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $699 | $470 |