Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X
82 Imaging
72 Features
88 Overall
78
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8632/d86327610387932a16ae68b1ac2ee9c069ac0ea3" alt="Fujifilm X-T30 II front Fujifilm X-T30 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b1/2c5b1898c62d7f187c0d40fb1eefb6649a2b2e72" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1X front Olympus OM-D E-M1X front"
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 383g - 118 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched September 2021
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T30
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Fujifilm X-T30 II versus Olympus E-M1X, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T30 II (26MP) and E-M1X (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-T30 II (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-T30 II was brought out 2 years later than the E-M1X and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm X-T30 II scores versus the E-M1X with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T30 II and Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T30 II Gallery and Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T30 II over the Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-T30 II | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2021 | ![]() | January 2019 | Fresher by 32 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-T30 II
E-M1X | Fujifilm X-T30 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T30 II and Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-T30 II | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T30 II has exterior measurements of 118mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1X has proportions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-T30 II versus Olympus E-M1X in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T30 II vs the E-M1X.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2bd8/c2bd84f39d4b490b733554bad57a77565e66445b" alt="Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X size comparison Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T30 II and E-M1X is 82 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18165/181658c5989b09fb5769ed1156560c9513897b5a" alt="Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T30 II and E-M1X.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T30 II because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm X-T30 II will provide more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-T30 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23179/231791a7bbc95c56dc16b2336e1b24dea9ea35e4" alt="Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/573c0/573c0630ffa5a86428fd9f407132f237026e96b2" alt="Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T30 II vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Fujifilm X-T30 II | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T30 II | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2021-09-02 | 2019-01-24 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 62 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 900 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 997 grams (2.20 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 83 x 47mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 870 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Built-in |
Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | - |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Price at release | $900 | $2,999 |